We do not find ourselves until we see ourselves in the eyes of those who are other than human. ~Lorn Eiseley

We do not find ourselves until we see ourselves in the eyes of those who are other than human. ~Lorn Eiseley

(via everycage)

bonedust:

bonedust:

jaimepenguin:

Afro duck

I love duckies with pompoms. They’re so cute!

(via everycage)

animals

aworkkinprogress:

goawaytummy:

Green Smoothie - 1 cup baby spinach, 1 cup kale, 1 pear, 1 ½ cup of orange juice, and 1 frozen banana.

Chocolate Peanut Butter – 2 TBL unsweetened cocoa powder, 2 TBL peanut butter, ½ banana, 1 cup almond milk, ice. 320 calories total.

Mango Ginger — 2 cups frozen Mango, 1 cup frozen raspberries, 1 banana, ¼ cup chopped ginger, squeeze of lime, yogurt.

Strawberry Date — 1 date, 1 ½ cup frozen strawberries, 1 cup almond milk. Optional: 1 scoop protein powder or 1 TBL of flaxseed oil.

These all look so good. Definitely trying the mango ginger. :)

(via vegpocalypsenow)

vegan breakfast smoothies healthy snacks fruit

everycage:

nightmaresforaweek:

There are two types of free choices in life:

(a) Choices where you can exercise your basic freedoms with no aspect of being obligated either way (like deciding whether you will eat out, or eat at home this evening).

(b) Choices where we have as much freedom to choose as in (a), but where there is a moral obligation not to opt for one of the choices. Thus we have a freedom to make a choice, but we choose not to as we would regard it as morally abhorrent.

Many regard veganism as a matter of (a). There are no legal obligations on us either way, and the ‘non-vegan option’ is widely available in most areas of life. Hence at best, people relate veganism to be a matter of personal preference - a choice.

As common as this thinking is, it’s an irrational mistake.

Think of any ‘choice’ that fits into category (b). A common example is the choice of whether to buy human slaves or not. Slavery still exists in many countries around the world. It is especially prevalent in some third world countries – and were one to live in one of these places, one would almost certainly have a choice of whether to buy a person to be an unwilling slave or not (finance permitting). As I hope this extreme example shows, if we had the choice to buy a black child to obey our frivolous wishes, we would opt not to do so out of basic moral decency. (b) is a ‘choice’ in the loosest sense.

Indeed, it’s impossible to judge that this situation is an example of personal preference, so long as we judge any actions at all as morally problematic (the idea of slavery is that basic as a moral principle). Thus the choice to buy other people to use as slaves holds the implicit moral obligation that we shouldn’t choose to do so, *even if* the choice was as free so as to allow it both in legal jurisdiction and social acceptance (like it was almost anywhere on the planet just a handful of decades ago).

Following reason through

Given that veganism is an ethics based choice, to make an informed judgement about whether it’s an (a) or (b) type decision then we firstly need to forget about this legal and social acceptance for animal use. After all we’ve already seen acceptable activities can be found to extremely morally wrong (like with slavery). Social and legal change are things that should (and always have) followed morality, not the other way around. But once we remove social and legal excuses, what is left that could possibly make veganism an (a) choice?

After all, if an animal is sentient, she is an individual whom experiences her own life. The only moral justification for taking her out of her natural environment (without her informed consent, which cannot be gotten from non-human animals), or for killing her, or for using her as a resource for your enjoyment is if there was some reason for differentiating between humans and other species for these purposes. But what justification could there possibly be?

An interest in continuing to live, in not being tortured, in living your own life. The relevant characteristic to demand these interests is sentience: the ability to experience your own life and to feel what happens to you. Nothing more, nothing less. And animals do have this characteristic, whether we like it or not. Thus to justify a desire to use animals as slaves and resources, and to kill them at the end of their ‘use’ cannot be differentiated from the desire to do the same to any other sentient individual (like humans) if we are thinking rationally and without prejudice. Given that our most basic of moral principles denounces slavery to some sentient individuals (humans), then we don’t really have any ‘choice’ but to extend this principle to all races or species who are sentient. It’s the rational thing to do. And racist or speciesist excuses (as different as they are) don’t cut it.

If we listen to current societal attitudes, and current societal law, it will tell us that we currently think it’s okay to differentiate based on prejudice. But then two hundred years ago, it was telling us the same thing – only that time the prejudice was between different races of humans rather than different species of sentient animals. We need to reject this method of judging our actions, as we know it is flawed. Focusing on consistent, rational reasoning is the right way forward.

Legality doesn’t dissolve consistent reasoning

Veganism is not an (a) choice. It simply isn’t. It’s not a case of personal preference, unless we cowardly hide behind social acceptance or legal rules – concepts that were never meant to guide the development of morality. Does that mean I will force people to be vegan? No. That holds about as much pragmatic use as burning down slaughterhouses – a method as irrational as the groups behind them, clad as they are in balaclavas and a desperate desire to be rebels.

I believe, (and history is on my side) that people eventually do what’s right. Speciesism will go the same way as racism, sexism, and the same way as homophobia should be headed any day now. Prejudice is irrational and intelligent humans tend toward the rational. The rest follow. But this movement begins with you – law and society will change when individuals form the foundation for it, and that (at a very simple level) involves each of us ‘choosing’ to be vegan and telling other people about why we are doing it. Far from being a personal preference or opinion, this is a moral obligation. Let’s not shirk this obligation. Start 2012 how we mean to go on for the rest of our lives.

(Source)

Perfection.

vegan

pumpkinqueen999:

Vegan Spinach and Mushroom Ravioli! I need to make this meow.

pumpkinqueen999:

Vegan Spinach and Mushroom Ravioli! I need to make this meow.

vegan recipes ravioli food

Ellen and Portia on the Rachael Ray Show

“Honestly, I would eat cardboard rather than going back to eating animals” - Ellen Degeneres

Never thought I’d see this conversation happen on the freaking Rachael Ray show! It’s always great to see veganism get some mainstream attention. And I’ll bet everyone in the audience received a free copy of the vegan cookbook! Awesome.

vegan